← All articles Engineering

OBTO vs Lovable & Base44: Vibe Coding You Can Actually Own

OBTO Team · Insights from the Glass Box

Lovable and Base44 are two of the most impressive products of the vibe-coding era. You describe an app in plain language and a working product appears in minutes — polished UI, database, auth, hosting. They've earned their growth: Base44 reached hundreds of thousands of users fast enough that Wix acquired it for $80 million six months after launch, and Lovable has become many people's first experience of shipping software at all.

We get asked how OBTO compares, and the honest answer starts the same way as our LangSmith and Langfuse comparison did: the overlap is real but partial. All three of us share the same opening move — describe it, ship it. The divergence is in the third step, the one our whole company is named for: own it.

What each platform is

Lovable is a prompt-to-app builder focused on beautiful React frontends, with Supabase supplying the database and auth, GitHub sync for your code, and hosting on their domains. Plans run from a free tier (5 credits a day) to Pro at $25/month for 100 credits and Business at $50/month. Every message to the AI spends credits.

Base44 is the batteries-included version of the same idea — database, auth, and hosting are built in rather than wired to external services, which makes it one of the smoothest paths from sentence to working business app. Now part of Wix, it prices from a free tier (25 message credits) through Starter at $16, Builder at $40, Pro at $80, and Elite at $160 a month on annual billing, all credit-based.

OBTO is an AI-native platform for building and running full-stack software and agents. You describe what you want from any MCP client — Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor — and the platform writes and wires the artifacts: pages, API routes, server scripts, scheduled workers, MCP tools. It's fully managed cloud by default, self-hostable on your own Kubernetes at the Enterprise tier, and headless — there is no builder UI you're required to live in.

Where Lovable and Base44 genuinely win

A fair comparison concedes real strengths, so here they are. If you want the fastest possible path to a beautiful interface, Lovable's design taste is the best in the category. If you want the gentlest on-ramp for a non-technical founder building an internal tool or MVP this weekend, Base44's all-in-one simplicity is hard to beat. Both have enormous communities, template libraries, and polish that comes from optimizing one journey — prompt to pretty product — relentlessly. For a landing page, a portfolio, a weekend MVP to test demand: use them, sincerely.

The third step: own it

Our slogan is "Describe it. Ship it. Own it." — and the third clause is where this category quietly splits. On most app builders, what you can take with you is a code export; what you actually use lives inside their walls. The hosting is theirs, the runtime is theirs, the backend conventions are theirs, and the day you outgrow them, "your" app is a migration project.

OBTO's bet is structural: the app is data. Every page, route, server script, policy, and MCP tool in an OBTO app is a queryable, versioned record — not output trapped in a proprietary build system. That has three consequences. You can inspect everything the platform wrote, because there is no black box to outgrow. You can move everything, because the same records run identically on OBTO's cloud or your own Kubernetes cluster. And your AI tools can keep editing the app forever, because software-as-data is exactly what LLMs are good at reading and patching. Software, returned to the people who use it.

Credits for prompting vs. paying for what runs

The billing structures tell you what each platform optimizes for. Credit systems charge you to ask: a tweak costs half a credit, a feature costs a few, and a debugging loop on a stubborn bug burns through an allowance — real-world Lovable builds routinely exceed Pro's 100 monthly credits, with heavier users budgeting $30–50/month in top-ups, and Base44's tiers double credits as you climb.

OBTO doesn't meter your prompts, because you bring your own AI client — your conversation with Claude or ChatGPT is between you and them. The platform meters what runs: tokens, requests, and storage at published rates, from a free Builder tier to Team at $49/month and Business at $149/month, per application rather than per seat. Every charge appears on the Glass Receipt, the same per-run ledger we covered in our cost-tracking guide. You can disagree with our rates; you'll never have to guess at them.

Beyond the demo: operational software

The deeper difference is what kind of software each platform grows into. Prompt-to-app builders are optimized for software you look at — dashboards, CRUD tools, storefronts. OBTO is optimized for software that works while you don't: agents with guardrails, scheduled workers, API engines, and hosted MCP servers. MCP tools on OBTO are created and updated at runtime — define a tool and it's callable the moment it's saved, no redeploy — which is why teams use OBTO to stand up their company MCP server, not just their company website. And because the platform runs the workload, every action lands in a Glass Box trace: who called what, with which tokens, at what cost.

How to choose

All three have free tiers, so the cheapest research is an afternoon with each. If you want to see what apps-as-data feels like, the getting-started guide ships your first OBTO application in about ten minutes — and our pricing page shows exactly what it costs to keep it running. Describe it. Ship it. Own it.

Describe it. Ship it. Own it.

Full-stack apps and agents as portable, queryable data — built from any MCP client, with a receipt for every run.

Get started

More from the OBTO blog